【优化】COUNT(1)、COUNT(*)、COUNT(常量)、COUNT(主键)、COUNT(ROWID)等

优化】COUNT(1)、COUNT(*)、COUNT(常量)、COUNT(主键)、COUNT(ROWID)、COUNT(非空列)、COUNT(允许为空列)、COUNT(DISTINCT 列名)

 

1.1  BLOG文档结构图

 

 

1.2  前言部分

1.2.1  导读和注意事项

各位技术爱好者,看完本文后,你可以掌握如下的技能,也可以学到一些其它你所不知道的知识,~O(∩_∩)O~:

① COUNT(1)和COUNT(*)的区别(重点)

② 10046和10053的使用

③ “SELECT COUNT(列)”和“SELECT 列”在选择索引方面的区别

④ COUNT计数的优化

Tips:

① 本文在itpub(http://blog.itpub.net/26736162)、博客园(http://www.cnblogs.com/lhrbest)和微信公众号(xiaomaimiaolhr)上有同步更新。

② 文章中用到的所有代码、相关软件、相关资料及本文的pdf版本都请前往小麦苗的云盘下载,小麦苗的云盘地址见:http://blog.itpub.net/26736162/viewspace-1624453/

③ 若网页文章代码格式有错乱,请下载pdf格式的文档来阅读。

④ 在本篇BLOG中,代码输出部分一般放在一行一列的表格中。

⑤ 本文适合于Oracle初中级人员阅读,Oracle大师请略过本文。

本文有错误或不完善的地方请大家多多指正,您的批评指正是我写作的最大动力。

1.2.2  本文简介

看了很多有关COUNT(1)和COUNT(*)的区别和效率,众说纷纭。最终还是决定自己动手实验一番。

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

第二章 实验部分

2.1  实验环境介绍


项目


source db


db 类型


RAC


db version


11.2.0.3.0


db 存储


ASM


OS版本及kernel版本


RHEL 6.5

2.2  实验目标

弄清楚COUNT(1)、COUNT(*)、COUNT(常量)、COUNT(主键)、COUNT(ROWID)、COUNT(非空列)、COUNT(允许为空列)、COUNT(DISTINCT 列名)之间的区别,以及它们之间的效率问题。

2.3  实验过程

2.3.1  实验脚本


--创建1W行的表

DROP TABLE T_COUNT_LHR;

CREATE TABLE T_COUNT_LHR AS

SELECT OBJECT_ID,

       OBJECT_NAME,

       OWNER,

       DATA_OBJECT_ID,

       OBJECT_TYPE,

       LAST_DDL_TIME

  FROM DBA_OBJECTS D

WHERE D.OBJECT_ID IS NOT NULL

   AND D.OBJECT_NAME IS NOT NULL

   AND ROWNUM <= 10000;

 

 

--更新空值,

UPDATE T_COUNT_LHR t SET t.object_type='' WHERE Rownum<=5;

UPDATE T_COUNT_LHR t SET t.LAST_DDL_TIME=T.LAST_DDL_TIME+ROWNUM;

UPDATE T_COUNT_LHR t SET t.LAST_DDL_TIME='' WHERE Rownum<=1;

COMMIT;

 

 

--添加主键、非空约束、唯一索引、普通索引

ALTER TABLE T_COUNT_LHR ADD CONSTRAINT PK_OBJECT_ID PRIMARY KEY(OBJECT_ID);

ALTER TABLE T_COUNT_LHR MODIFY OBJECT_NAME NOT NULL;

CREATE UNIQUE INDEX IDX_LDT ON T_COUNT_LHR(LAST_DDL_TIME);

CREATE  INDEX IDX_DATA_OBJECT_ID ON T_COUNT_LHR(DATA_OBJECT_ID);

CREATE  INDEX IDX_DATA_OWNER ON T_COUNT_LHR(OWNER);

ALTER TABLE T_COUNT_LHR MODIFY OWNER NOT NULL;

 

 

--收集统计信息

EXEC dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(USER,'T_COUNT_LHR');

SELECT d.COLUMN_NAME,d.DATA_TYPE,d.NUM_NULLS,d.NUM_DISTINCT,d.LAST_ANALYZED FROM cols d WHERE d.TABLE_NAME='T_COUNT_LHR';

 

 

表的信息如下所示:


列名


是否主键


是否允许为空


是否有索引


数据类型


空值的行数


不同值的行数


总行数


OBJECT_ID


Y


N


唯一索引


NUMBER


0


10000


10000


OBJECT_NAME


 


N



VARCHAR2


0


8112


10000


OWNER


 


N


普通索引(IDX_OWNER)


VARCHAR2


0


5


10000


DATA_OBJECT_ID


 


Y


普通索引(IDX_DATA_OBJECT_ID)


NUMBER


7645


2318


10000


OBJECT_TYPE


 


Y



VARCHAR2


5


20


10000


LAST_DDL_TIME


 


Y


唯一索引(IDX_LDT)


DATE


1


9999


10000

 

需要统计如下几种情况:


SELECT COUNT(1) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;--走索引

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;--走索引

SELECT COUNT(ROWID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR; --走索引

SELECT COUNT(OBJECT_ID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR; --走索引

SELECT COUNT(OBJECT_NAME) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;--走索引

SELECT COUNT(OWNER) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D;--走索引

SELECT COUNT(D.DATA_OBJECT_ID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D; --走索引

SELECT COUNT(D.LAST_DDL_TIME) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D;--走索引

SELECT COUNT(D.LAST_DDL_TIME) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D WHERE D.LAST_DDL_TIME IS NOT NULL;--走索引

SELECT D.LAST_DDL_TIME FROM T_COUNT_LHR D; --不走索引

SELECT D.LAST_DDL_TIME FROM T_COUNT_LHR D WHERE D.LAST_DDL_TIME IS NOT NULL;--走索引

SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT DATA_OBJECT_ID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D;--不走索引

SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT OWNER) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D;--走索引

SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT DATA_OBJECT_ID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D WHERE DATA_OBJECT_ID IS NOT NULL ;--走索引

 

2.3.2  执行计划


介绍


SQL命令


执行计划


返回行数


COUNT(1)和COUNT(常量)是一样的,SELECT COUNT(*) "COUNT(1)" FROM "LHR"."T_COUNT_LHR" "T_COUNT_LHR"


SELECT COUNT(1) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;


Plan hash value: 1265209789

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name         | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |              |     1 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |              |     1 |            |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_OBJECT_ID | 10000 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


10000


SELECT COUNT(*) "COUNT(*)" FROM "LHR"."T_COUNT_LHR" "T_COUNT_LHR"


SELECT COUNT(*) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;


Plan hash value: 1265209789

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name         | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |              |     1 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |              |     1 |            |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_OBJECT_ID | 10000 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


10000


SELECT COUNT("T_COUNT_LHR".ROWID) "COUNT(ROWID)" FROM "LHR"."T_COUNT_LHR" "T_COUNT_LHR"


SELECT COUNT(ROWID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;


Plan hash value: 1265209789

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name         | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |              |     1 |    12 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |              |     1 |    12 |            |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_OBJECT_ID | 10000 |   117K|     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


10000


SELECT COUNT(*) "COUNT(OBJECT_ID)" FROM "LHR"."T_COUNT_LHR" "T_COUNT_LHR"


SELECT COUNT(OBJECT_ID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;


Plan hash value: 1265209789

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name         | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |              |     1 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |              |     1 |            |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_OBJECT_ID | 10000 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


10000


SELECT COUNT(*) "COUNT(OBJECT_NAME)" FROM "LHR"."T_COUNT_LHR" "T_COUNT_LHR"


SELECT COUNT(OBJECT_NAME) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;


Plan hash value: 1265209789

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name         | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |              |     1 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |              |     1 |            |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_OBJECT_ID | 10000 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


10000


OWNER列含有索引,非空列,选择主键索引


SELECT COUNT(OWNER) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D;


Plan hash value: 1265209789

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name         | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |              |     1 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |              |     1 |            |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_OBJECT_ID | 10000 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


10000


DATA_OBJECT_ID列允许为空,含有普通索引


SELECT COUNT(D.DATA_OBJECT_ID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D;


Plan hash value: 2404962198

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name               | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |                    |     1 |     2 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |                    |     1 |     2 |            |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_DATA_OBJECT_ID | 10000 | 20000 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2355


注意,COUNT(列)计算的是列值为非空的行数


SELECT COUNT(D.LAST_DDL_TIME) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D;


Plan hash value: 887614938

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |         |     1 |     8 |     9   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |         |     1 |     8 |            |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_LDT | 10000 | 80000 |     9   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


9999


SELECT COUNT(D.LAST_DDL_TIME) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D WHERE D.LAST_DDL_TIME IS NOT NULL;


Plan hash value: 887614938

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |         |     1 |     8 |     9   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |         |     1 |     8 |            |          |

|*  2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_LDT |  9999 | 79992 |     9   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


9999


由于列中存在空值,所以不会选择索引。加上IS NOT NULL就可以选择索引了。


SELECT D.LAST_DDL_TIME FROM T_COUNT_LHR D;


Plan hash value: 2392171920

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation         | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |             | 10000 | 80000 |    22   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_COUNT_LHR | 10000 | 80000 |    22   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


10000


SELECT D.LAST_DDL_TIME FROM T_COUNT_LHR D WHERE D.LAST_DDL_TIME IS NOT NULL;


Plan hash value: 2419516343

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation            | Name    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |         |  9999 | 79992 |     9   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|*  1 |  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_LDT |  9999 | 79992 |     9   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


9999


DISTINCT允许为空列不会选择索引,而DISTINCT非空列会选择索引


SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT DATA_OBJECT_ID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D;


Plan hash value: 3258478826

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation            | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |             |     1 |    13 |    23   (5)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE      |             |     1 |    13 |            |          |

|   2 |   VIEW               | VW_DAG_0    |  2318 | 30134 |    23   (5)| 00:00:01 |

|   3 |    HASH GROUP BY     |             |  2318 |  4636 |    23   (5)| 00:00:01 |

|   4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_COUNT_LHR | 10000 | 20000 |    22   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2318


SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT OWNER) FROM T_COUNT_LHR D;


Plan hash value: 4008695099

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation               | Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT        |                |     1 |    17 |     9  (12)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE         |                |     1 |    17 |            |          |

|   2 |   VIEW                  | VW_DAG_0       |     5 |    85 |     9  (12)| 00:00:01 |

|   3 |    HASH GROUP BY        |                |     5 |    30 |     9  (12)| 00:00:01 |

|   4 |     INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_DATA_OWNER | 10000 | 60000 |     8   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


5

 

2.3.3  10046事件


alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12';

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;

alter system flush buffer_cache;

alter system flush shared_pool;

SELECT COUNT(1) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;

alter system flush buffer_cache;

alter system flush shared_pool;

SELECT COUNT(ROWID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;

alter session set events '10046 trace name context OFF';

select value from v$diag_info where name like '%Default%';

exit

 


tkprof orclasm_ora_13825.trc orclasm_ora_13825.out

 


alter system flush buffer_cache;

alter system flush shared_pool;

alter session set sql_trace=true;

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;

alter system flush buffer_cache;

alter system flush shared_pool;

SELECT COUNT(1) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;

alter system flush buffer_cache;

alter system flush shared_pool;

SELECT COUNT(ROWID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;

alter session set sql_trace=false;

select value from v$diag_info where name like '%Default%';

 

 


********************************************************************************

count    = number of times OCI procedure was executed

cpu      = cpu time in seconds executing

elapsed  = elapsed time in seconds executing

disk     = number of physical reads of buffers from disk

query    = number of buffers gotten for consistent read

current  = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)

rows     = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call

 

********************************************************************************

 

SQL ID: g9rksvy7gkdmj Plan Hash: 1265209789

 

SELECT COUNT(*)

FROM

T_COUNT_LHR

 

 

call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows

------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------

Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0

Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0

Fetch        2      0.00       0.55         22         25          0           1

------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------

total        4      0.01       0.56         22         25          0           1

 

Misses in library cache during parse: 1

Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS

Parsing user id: 90 

Number of plan statistics captured: 1

 

Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max)  Row Source Operation

---------- ---------- ----------  ---------------------------------------------------

         1          1          1  SORT AGGREGATE (cr=25 pr=22 pw=0 time=552894 us)

     10000      10000      10000   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN PK_OBJECT_ID (cr=25 pr=22 pw=0 time=2502 us cost=7 size=0 card=10000)(object id 159543)

 

********************************************************************************

 

SQL ID: 4abkxq9x7uamj Plan Hash: 1265209789

 

SELECT COUNT(1)

FROM

T_COUNT_LHR

 

 

call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows

------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------

Parse        1      0.00       0.01          0          0          0           0

Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0

Fetch        2      0.00       0.00         22         25          0           1

------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------

total        4      0.00       0.01         22         25          0           1

 

Misses in library cache during parse: 1

Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS

Parsing user id: 90 

Number of plan statistics captured: 1

 

Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max)  Row Source Operation

---------- ---------- ----------  ---------------------------------------------------

         1          1          1  SORT AGGREGATE (cr=25 pr=22 pw=0 time=5934 us)

     10000      10000      10000   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN PK_OBJECT_ID (cr=25 pr=22 pw=0 time=2469 us cost=7 size=0 card=10000)(object id 159543)

 

********************************************************************************

 

SQL ID: 4tm3jwzff8ub8 Plan Hash: 1265209789

 

SELECT COUNT(ROWID)

FROM

T_COUNT_LHR

 

 

call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows

------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------

Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0

Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0

Fetch        2      0.00       0.01         22         25          0           1

------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------

total        4      0.00       0.01         22         25          0           1

 

Misses in library cache during parse: 1

Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS

Parsing user id: 90 

Number of plan statistics captured: 1

 

Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max)  Row Source Operation

---------- ---------- ----------  ---------------------------------------------------

         1          1          1  SORT AGGREGATE (cr=25 pr=22 pw=0 time=11264 us)

     10000      10000      10000   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN PK_OBJECT_ID (cr=25 pr=22 pw=0 time=762 us cost=7 size=120000 card=10000)(object id 159543)

 

********************************************************************************

 

2.3.4  10053事件

alter session set events '10053 trace name context forever, level 12';

alter session set events '10053 trace name context OFF';


alter system flush buffer_cache;

alter system flush shared_pool;

alter session set events '10053 trace name context forever, level 12';

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;

alter system flush buffer_cache;

alter system flush shared_pool;

SELECT COUNT(1) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;

alter system flush buffer_cache;

alter system flush shared_pool;

SELECT COUNT(ROWID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;

alter session set events '10053 trace name context OFF';

select value from v$diag_info where name like '%Default%';

 

 

 

搜索关键词“Final”、“Starting”:

 


 

 

Final query after transformations:******* UNPARSED QUERY IS *******

SELECT COUNT(*) "COUNT(*)" FROM "LHR"."T_COUNT_LHR" "T_COUNT_LHR"

kkoqbc: optimizing query block SEL$1 (#0)

       

        :

    call(in-use=1216, alloc=16344), compile(in-use=58000, alloc=58544), execution(in-use=2480, alloc=4032)

 

kkoqbc-subheap (create addr=0x7f9950a9fb58)

****************

QUERY BLOCK TEXT

****************

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM T_COUNT_LHR

---------------------

QUERY BLOCK SIGNATURE

---------------------

signature (optimizer): qb_name=SEL$1 nbfros=1 flg=0

  fro(0): flg=0 objn=159542 hint_alias="T_COUNT_LHR"@"SEL$1"

 

-----------------------------

SYSTEM STATISTICS INFORMATION

-----------------------------

  Using NOWORKLOAD Stats

  CPUSPEEDNW: 1752 millions instructions/sec (default is 100)

  IOTFRSPEED: 4096 bytes per millisecond (default is 4096)

  IOSEEKTIM:  10 milliseconds (default is 10)

  MBRC:       NO VALUE blocks (default is 8)

 

***************************************

BASE STATISTICAL INFORMATION

***********************

Table Stats::

  Table: T_COUNT_LHR  Alias: T_COUNT_LHR

    #Rows: 10000  #Blks:  75  AvgRowLen:  44.00  ChainCnt:  0.00

Index Stats::

  Index: IDX_DATA_OBJECT_ID  Col#: 4

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 5  #DK: 2318  LB/K: 1.00  DB/K: 1.00  CLUF: 86.00

  Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER  Col#: 3

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 23  #DK: 5  LB/K: 4.00  DB/K: 28.00  CLUF: 141.00

  Index: IDX_LDT  Col#: 6

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 26  #DK: 9999  LB/K: 1.00  DB/K: 1.00  CLUF: 377.00

  Index: PK_OBJECT_ID  Col#: 1

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 20  #DK: 10000  LB/K: 1.00  DB/K: 1.00  CLUF: 76.00

    Access path analysis for T_COUNT_LHR

***************************************

SINGLE TABLE ACCESS PATH

  Single Table Cardinality Estimation for T_COUNT_LHR[T_COUNT_LHR]

  Table: T_COUNT_LHR  Alias: T_COUNT_LHR

    Card: Original: 10000.000000  Rounded: 10000  Computed: 10000.00  Non Adjusted: 10000.00

  Access Path: TableScan

    Cost:  22.10  Resp: 22.10  Degree: 0

      Cost_io: 22.00  Cost_cpu: 2034108

      Resp_io: 22.00  Resp_cpu: 2034108

  Access Path: index (index (FFS))

    Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER

    resc_io: 8.00  resc_cpu: 1363793

    ix_sel: 0.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

  Access Path: index (FFS)

    Cost:  8.06  Resp: 8.06  Degree: 1

      Cost_io: 8.00  Cost_cpu: 1363793

      Resp_io: 8.00  Resp_cpu: 1363793

  Access Path: index (index (FFS))

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 7.00  resc_cpu: 1342429

    ix_sel: 0.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

  Access Path: index (FFS)

    Cost:  7.06  Resp: 7.06  Degree: 1

      Cost_io: 7.00  Cost_cpu: 1342429

      Resp_io: 7.00  Resp_cpu: 1342429

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER

    resc_io: 24.00  resc_cpu: 2170915

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 24.10  Resp: 24.10  Degree: 1

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 21.00  resc_cpu: 2149550

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 21.10  Resp: 21.10  Degree: 1

  ****** trying bitmap/domain indexes ******

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER

    resc_io: 24.00  resc_cpu: 2170915

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 24.10  Resp: 24.10  Degree: 0

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 21.00  resc_cpu: 2149550

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 21.10  Resp: 21.10  Degree: 0

  ****** finished trying bitmap/domain indexes ******

******** Begin index join costing ********

  ****** trying bitmap/domain indexes ******

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER

    resc_io: 24.00  resc_cpu: 2170915

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 24.10  Resp: 24.10  Degree: 0

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 21.00  resc_cpu: 2149550

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 21.10  Resp: 21.10  Degree: 0

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 21.00  resc_cpu: 2149550

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 21.10  Resp: 21.10  Degree: 0

  Bitmap nodes:

    Used PK_OBJECT_ID

      Cost = 26.377821, sel = 1.000000

  ****** finished trying bitmap/domain indexes ******

******** End index join costing ********

  Best:: AccessPath: IndexFFS

  Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

         Cost: 7.06  Degree: 1  Resp: 7.06  Card: 10000.00  Bytes: 0

 

***************************************

。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

 

Starting SQL statement dump

 

user_id=90 user_name=LHR module=SQL*Plus action=

sql_id=g9rksvy7gkdmj plan_hash_value=1265209789 problem_type=3

----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=g9rksvy7gkdmj) -----

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM T_COUNT_LHR

sql_text_length=33

sql=SELECT COUNT(*) FROM T_COUNT_LHR

----- Explain Plan Dump -----

----- Plan Table -----

 

============

Plan Table

============

---------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

| Id  | Operation              | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  | Time      |

---------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

| 0   | SELECT STATEMENT       |             |       |       |     7 |           |

| 1   |  SORT AGGREGATE        |             |     1 |       |       |           |

| 2   |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | PK_OBJECT_ID|   10K |       |     7 |  00:00:01 |

---------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

Predicate Information:

----------------------

 

Content of other_xml column

===========================

  db_version     : 11.2.0.3

  parse_schema   : LHR

  plan_hash      : 1265209789

  plan_hash_2    : 3881728982

  Outline Data:

  /*+

    BEGIN_OUTLINE_DATA

      IGNORE_OPTIM_EMBEDDED_HINTS

      OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE('11.2.0.3')

      DB_VERSION('11.2.0.3')

      OPT_PARAM('star_transformation_enabled' 'true')

      ALL_ROWS

      OUTLINE_LEAF(@"SEL$1")

      INDEX_FFS(@"SEL$1" "T_COUNT_LHR"@"SEL$1" ("T_COUNT_LHR"."OBJECT_ID"))

    END_OUTLINE_DATA

  */

 

  。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

====================== END SQL Statement Dump ======================

 

 

Final query after transformations:******* UNPARSED QUERY IS *******

SELECT COUNT(*) "COUNT(1)" FROM "LHR"."T_COUNT_LHR" "T_COUNT_LHR"

kkoqbc: optimizing query block SEL$1 (#0)

       

        :

    call(in-use=1240, alloc=16344), compile(in-use=58312, alloc=58544), execution(in-use=2480, alloc=4032)

 

kkoqbc-subheap (create addr=0x7f9950a9fb58)

****************

QUERY BLOCK TEXT

****************

SELECT COUNT(1) FROM T_COUNT_LHR

---------------------

QUERY BLOCK SIGNATURE

---------------------

signature (optimizer): qb_name=SEL$1 nbfros=1 flg=0

  fro(0): flg=0 objn=159542 hint_alias="T_COUNT_LHR"@"SEL$1"

 

-----------------------------

SYSTEM STATISTICS INFORMATION

-----------------------------

  Using NOWORKLOAD Stats

  CPUSPEEDNW: 1752 millions instructions/sec (default is 100)

  IOTFRSPEED: 4096 bytes per millisecond (default is 4096)

  IOSEEKTIM:  10 milliseconds (default is 10)

  MBRC:       NO VALUE blocks (default is 8)

 

***************************************

BASE STATISTICAL INFORMATION

***********************

Table Stats::

  Table: T_COUNT_LHR  Alias: T_COUNT_LHR

    #Rows: 10000  #Blks:  75  AvgRowLen:  44.00  ChainCnt:  0.00

Index Stats::

  Index: IDX_DATA_OBJECT_ID  Col#: 4

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 5  #DK: 2318  LB/K: 1.00  DB/K: 1.00  CLUF: 86.00

  Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER  Col#: 3

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 23  #DK: 5  LB/K: 4.00  DB/K: 28.00  CLUF: 141.00

  Index: IDX_LDT  Col#: 6

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 26  #DK: 9999  LB/K: 1.00  DB/K: 1.00  CLUF: 377.00

  Index: PK_OBJECT_ID  Col#: 1

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 20  #DK: 10000  LB/K: 1.00  DB/K: 1.00  CLUF: 76.00

Access path analysis for T_COUNT_LHR

***************************************

SINGLE TABLE ACCESS PATH

  Single Table Cardinality Estimation for T_COUNT_LHR[T_COUNT_LHR]

  Table: T_COUNT_LHR  Alias: T_COUNT_LHR

    Card: Original: 10000.000000  Rounded: 10000  Computed: 10000.00  Non Adjusted: 10000.00

  Access Path: TableScan

    Cost:  22.10  Resp: 22.10  Degree: 0

      Cost_io: 22.00  Cost_cpu: 2034108

      Resp_io: 22.00  Resp_cpu: 2034108

  Access Path: index (index (FFS))

    Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER

    resc_io: 8.00  resc_cpu: 1363793

    ix_sel: 0.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

  Access Path: index (FFS)

    Cost:  8.06  Resp: 8.06  Degree: 1

      Cost_io: 8.00  Cost_cpu: 1363793

      Resp_io: 8.00  Resp_cpu: 1363793

  Access Path: index (index (FFS))

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 7.00  resc_cpu: 1342429

    ix_sel: 0.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

  Access Path: index (FFS)

    Cost:  7.06  Resp: 7.06  Degree: 1

      Cost_io: 7.00  Cost_cpu: 1342429

      Resp_io: 7.00  Resp_cpu: 1342429

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER

    resc_io: 24.00  resc_cpu: 2170915

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 24.10  Resp: 24.10  Degree: 1

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 21.00  resc_cpu: 2149550

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 21.10  Resp: 21.10  Degree: 1

  ****** trying bitmap/domain indexes ******

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER

    resc_io: 24.00  resc_cpu: 2170915

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 24.10  Resp: 24.10  Degree: 0

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 21.00  resc_cpu: 2149550

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 21.10  Resp: 21.10  Degree: 0

  ****** finished trying bitmap/domain indexes ******

******** Begin index join costing ********

  ****** trying bitmap/domain indexes ******

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER

    resc_io: 24.00  resc_cpu: 2170915

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 24.10  Resp: 24.10  Degree: 0

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 21.00  resc_cpu: 2149550

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 21.10  Resp: 21.10  Degree: 0

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 21.00  resc_cpu: 2149550

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 21.10  Resp: 21.10  Degree: 0

  Bitmap nodes:

    Used PK_OBJECT_ID

      Cost = 26.377821, sel = 1.000000

  ****** finished trying bitmap/domain indexes ******

******** End index join costing ********

  Best:: AccessPath: IndexFFS

  Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

         Cost: 7.06  Degree: 1  Resp: 7.06  Card: 10000.00  Bytes: 0

 

***************************************

。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

Starting SQL statement dump

 

user_id=90 user_name=LHR module=SQL*Plus action=

sql_id=4abkxq9x7uamj plan_hash_value=1265209789 problem_type=3

----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=4abkxq9x7uamj) -----

SELECT COUNT(1) FROM T_COUNT_LHR

sql_text_length=33

sql=SELECT COUNT(1) FROM T_COUNT_LHR

----- Explain Plan Dump -----

----- Plan Table -----

 

============

Plan Table

============

---------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

| Id  | Operation              | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  | Time      |

---------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

| 0   | SELECT STATEMENT       |             |       |       |     7 |           |

| 1   |  SORT AGGREGATE        |             |     1 |       |       |           |

| 2   |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | PK_OBJECT_ID|   10K |       |     7 |  00:00:01 |

---------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

Predicate Information:

----------------------

 

Content of other_xml column

===========================

  db_version     : 11.2.0.3

  parse_schema   : LHR

  plan_hash      : 1265209789

  plan_hash_2    : 3881728982

  Outline Data:

  /*+

    BEGIN_OUTLINE_DATA

      IGNORE_OPTIM_EMBEDDED_HINTS

      OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE('11.2.0.3')

      DB_VERSION('11.2.0.3')

      OPT_PARAM('star_transformation_enabled' 'true')

      ALL_ROWS

      OUTLINE_LEAF(@"SEL$1")

      INDEX_FFS(@"SEL$1" "T_COUNT_LHR"@"SEL$1" ("T_COUNT_LHR"."OBJECT_ID"))

    END_OUTLINE_DATA

  */

 

 

 

 

====================== END SQL Statement Dump ======================

 

 

******************************************

----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=4tm3jwzff8ub8) -----

SELECT COUNT(ROWID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR

*******************************************

。。。。。。。。。

Final query after transformations:******* UNPARSED QUERY IS *******

SELECT COUNT("T_COUNT_LHR".ROWID) "COUNT(ROWID)" FROM "LHR"."T_COUNT_LHR" "T_COUNT_LHR"

kkoqbc: optimizing query block SEL$1 (#0)

       

        :

    call(in-use=1240, alloc=16344), compile(in-use=58224, alloc=62688), execution(in-use=2480, alloc=4032)

 

kkoqbc-subheap (create addr=0x7f9950a9fb58)

****************

QUERY BLOCK TEXT

****************

SELECT COUNT(ROWID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR

---------------------

QUERY BLOCK SIGNATURE

---------------------

signature (optimizer): qb_name=SEL$1 nbfros=1 flg=0

  fro(0): flg=0 objn=159542 hint_alias="T_COUNT_LHR"@"SEL$1"

 

-----------------------------

SYSTEM STATISTICS INFORMATION

-----------------------------

  Using NOWORKLOAD Stats

  CPUSPEEDNW: 1752 millions instructions/sec (default is 100)

  IOTFRSPEED: 4096 bytes per millisecond (default is 4096)

  IOSEEKTIM:  10 milliseconds (default is 10)

  MBRC:       NO VALUE blocks (default is 8)

 

***************************************

BASE STATISTICAL INFORMATION

***********************

Table Stats::

  Table: T_COUNT_LHR  Alias: T_COUNT_LHR

    #Rows: 10000  #Blks:  75  AvgRowLen:  44.00  ChainCnt:  0.00

Index Stats::

  Index: IDX_DATA_OBJECT_ID  Col#: 4

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 5  #DK: 2318  LB/K: 1.00  DB/K: 1.00  CLUF: 86.00

  Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER  Col#: 3

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 23  #DK: 5  LB/K: 4.00  DB/K: 28.00  CLUF: 141.00

  Index: IDX_LDT  Col#: 6

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 26  #DK: 9999  LB/K: 1.00  DB/K: 1.00  CLUF: 377.00

  Index: PK_OBJECT_ID  Col#: 1

    LVLS: 1  #LB: 20  #DK: 10000  LB/K: 1.00  DB/K: 1.00  CLUF: 76.00

Access path analysis for T_COUNT_LHR

***************************************

SINGLE TABLE ACCESS PATH

  Single Table Cardinality Estimation for T_COUNT_LHR[T_COUNT_LHR]

  Table: T_COUNT_LHR  Alias: T_COUNT_LHR

    Card: Original: 10000.000000  Rounded: 10000  Computed: 10000.00  Non Adjusted: 10000.00

  Access Path: TableScan

    Cost:  22.10  Resp: 22.10  Degree: 0

      Cost_io: 22.00  Cost_cpu: 2034108

      Resp_io: 22.00  Resp_cpu: 2034108

  Access Path: index (index (FFS))

    Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER

    resc_io: 8.00  resc_cpu: 1363793

    ix_sel: 0.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

  Access Path: index (FFS)

    Cost:  8.06  Resp: 8.06  Degree: 1

      Cost_io: 8.00  Cost_cpu: 1363793

      Resp_io: 8.00  Resp_cpu: 1363793

  Access Path: index (index (FFS))

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 7.00  resc_cpu: 1342429

    ix_sel: 0.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

  Access Path: index (FFS)

    Cost:  7.06  Resp: 7.06  Degree: 1

      Cost_io: 7.00  Cost_cpu: 1342429

      Resp_io: 7.00  Resp_cpu: 1342429

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER

    resc_io: 24.00  resc_cpu: 2170915

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 24.10  Resp: 24.10  Degree: 1

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 21.00  resc_cpu: 2149550

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 21.10  Resp: 21.10  Degree: 1

  ****** trying bitmap/domain indexes ******

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: IDX_DATA_OWNER

    resc_io: 24.00  resc_cpu: 2170915

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 24.10  Resp: 24.10  Degree: 0

  Access Path: index (FullScan)

    Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

    resc_io: 21.00  resc_cpu: 2149550

    ix_sel: 1.000000  ix_sel_with_filters: 1.000000

    Cost: 21.10  Resp: 21.10  Degree: 0

  ****** finished trying bitmap/domain indexes ******

  Best:: AccessPath: IndexFFS

  Index: PK_OBJECT_ID

         Cost: 7.06  Degree: 1  Resp: 7.06  Card: 10000.00  Bytes: 0

 

***************************************

 

。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

Starting SQL statement dump

 

user_id=90 user_name=LHR module=SQL*Plus action=

sql_id=4tm3jwzff8ub8 plan_hash_value=1265209789 problem_type=3

----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=4tm3jwzff8ub8) -----

SELECT COUNT(ROWID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR

sql_text_length=37

sql=SELECT COUNT(ROWID) FROM T_COUNT_LHR

----- Explain Plan Dump -----

----- Plan Table -----

 

============

Plan Table

============

---------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

| Id  | Operation              | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  | Time      |

---------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

| 0   | SELECT STATEMENT       |             |       |       |     7 |           |

| 1   |  SORT AGGREGATE        |             |     1 |    12 |       |           |

| 2   |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | PK_OBJECT_ID|   10K |  117K |     7 |  00:00:01 |

---------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

Predicate Information:

----------------------

 

Content of other_xml column

===========================

  db_version     : 11.2.0.3

  parse_schema   : LHR

  plan_hash      : 1265209789

  plan_hash_2    : 3881728982

  Outline Data:

  /*+

    BEGIN_OUTLINE_DATA

      IGNORE_OPTIM_EMBEDDED_HINTS

      OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE('11.2.0.3')

      DB_VERSION('11.2.0.3')

      OPT_PARAM('star_transformation_enabled' 'true')

      ALL_ROWS

      OUTLINE_LEAF(@"SEL$1")

      INDEX_FFS(@"SEL$1" "T_COUNT_LHR"@"SEL$1" ("T_COUNT_LHR"."OBJECT_ID"))

    END_OUTLINE_DATA

  */

。。。。。。。。。。。。

====================== END SQL Statement Dump ======================

 

 

 

2.3.5  COUNT(COL1)SELECT COL1的区别

其实在2014年的时候,小麦苗发布过一篇博客(http://blog.itpub.net/26736162/viewspace-1329880/),里边对这个问题有详细的实验。今天就把这个实验搬过来吧。


drop table t  purge;

Create Table t  nologging As select *  from    dba_objects d ;

create   index ind_objectname on  t(object_name); 

set autotrace traceonly;  

 

 

select t.object_name from t where t.object_name ='T';        --走索引

select t.object_name from t where UPPER(t.object_name) ='T';       --不走索引

select t.object_name from t where UPPER(t.object_name) ='T' and t.object_name IS NOT NULL ;           --走索引  (INDEX FAST FULL SCAN)

select t.object_name from t where UPPER(t.object_name) ||'AAA' ='T'||'AAA' and t.object_name IS NOT NULL ;     --走索引  (INDEX FAST FULL SCAN)

select t.object_name,t.owner from t where UPPER(t.object_name) ||'AAA' ='T'||'AAA' and t.object_name IS NOT NULL ;     --不走索引

 

 


C:\Users\xiaomaimiao>sqlplus lhr/lhr@orclasm

 

SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on 星期三 11月 12 10:52:29 2014

 

Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle.  All rights reserved.

 

 

连接到:

Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production

With the Partitioning, Automatic Storage Management, OLAP, Data Mining

and Real Application Testing options

 

SQL>

SQL>

SQL> drop table t  purge;

 

表已删除。

 

SQL> Create Table t  nologging As select *  from    dba_objects d ;

 

表已创建。

 

SQL>  create   index ind_objectname on  t(object_name);

 

索引已创建。

 

 

---- t表所有列均可以为空

 

SQL> desc t

Name   Null?    Type

----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------

OWNER    VARCHAR2(30)

OBJECT_NAME    VARCHAR2(128)

SUBOBJECT_NAME     VARCHAR2(30)

OBJECT_ID    NUMBER

DATA_OBJECT_ID     NUMBER

OBJECT_TYPE    VARCHAR2(19)

CREATED        DATE

LAST_DDL_TIME    DATE

TIMESTAMP    VARCHAR2(19)

STATUS         VARCHAR2(7)

TEMPORARY    VARCHAR2(1)

GENERATED    VARCHAR2(1)

SECONDARY    VARCHAR2(1)

NAMESPACE    NUMBER

EDITION_NAME    VARCHAR2(30)

 

SQL>

 

SQL>  set autotrace traceonly;

SQL>  select t.object_name from t where t.object_name ='T';

 

 

执行计划

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 4280870634

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation        | Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |                |     1 |    66 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|*  1 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| IND_OBJECTNAME |     1 |    66 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

 

   1 - access("T"."OBJECT_NAME"='T')

 

Note

-----

   - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

   - SQL plan baseline "SQL_PLAN_503ygb00mbj6k165e82cd" used for this statement

 

 

统计信息

----------------------------------------------------------

         34  recursive calls

         43  db block gets

        127  consistent gets

        398  physical reads

      15476  redo size

        349  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        359  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          0  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          1  rows processed

 

SQL>  select t.object_name from t where UPPER(t.object_name) ='T';

 

 

执行计划

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 1601196873

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation         | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |      |    12 |   792 |   305   (1)| 00:00:04 |

|*  1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    |    12 |   792 |   305   (1)| 00:00:04 |

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

 

   1 - filter(UPPER("T"."OBJECT_NAME")='T')

 

Note

-----

   - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

   - SQL plan baseline "SQL_PLAN_9p76pys5gdb2b94ecae5c" used for this statement

 

 

统计信息

----------------------------------------------------------

         29  recursive calls

         43  db block gets

       1209  consistent gets

       1092  physical reads

      15484  redo size

        349  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        359  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          0  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          1  rows processed

 

SQL>  select t.object_name from t where UPPER(t.object_name) ='T' and t.object_name IS NOT NULL ;

 

 

执行计划

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 3379870158

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation            | Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |                |    51 |  3366 |   110   (1)| 00:00:02 |

|*  1 |  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IND_OBJECTNAME |    51 |  3366 |   110   (1)| 00:00:02 |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

 

   1 - filter("T"."OBJECT_NAME" IS NOT NULL AND UPPER("T"."OBJECT_NAME")='T')

 

Note

-----

   - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

   - SQL plan baseline "SQL_PLAN_czkarb71kthws18b0c28f" used for this statement

 

 

统计信息

----------------------------------------------------------

         29  recursive calls

         43  db block gets

        505  consistent gets

        384  physical reads

      15612  redo size

        349  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        359  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          0  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          1  rows processed

 

SQL>  select t.object_name,t.owner from t where UPPER(t.object_name) ||'AAA' ='T'||'AAA' and t.object_name IS NOT NULL ;

 

 

执行计划

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 1601196873

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation         | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |      |    51 |  4233 |   304   (1)| 00:00:04 |

|*  1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    |    51 |  4233 |   304   (1)| 00:00:04 |

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

 

   1 - filter("T"."OBJECT_NAME" IS NOT NULL AND

              UPPER("T"."OBJECT_NAME")||'AAA'='TAAA')

 

Note

-----

   - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

   - SQL plan baseline "SQL_PLAN_au9a1c4hwdtb894ecae5c" used for this statement

 

 

统计信息

----------------------------------------------------------

         30  recursive calls

         44  db block gets

       1210  consistent gets

       1091  physical reads

      15748  redo size

        408  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        359  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          0  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          1  rows processed

 

SQL> select t.object_name from t where UPPER(t.object_name) ||'AAA' ='T'||'AAA' and t.object_name IS NOT NULL ;

 

 

执行计划

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 3379870158

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation            | Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |                |    51 |  3366 |   110   (1)| 00:00:02 |

|*  1 |  INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IND_OBJECTNAME |    51 |  3366 |   110   (1)| 00:00:02 |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

 

   1 - filter("T"."OBJECT_NAME" IS NOT NULL AND

              UPPER("T"."OBJECT_NAME")||'AAA'='TAAA')

 

Note

-----

   - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

   - SQL plan baseline "SQL_PLAN_1gu36rnh3s2a318b0c28f" used for this statement

 

 

统计信息

----------------------------------------------------------

         28  recursive calls

         44  db block gets

        505  consistent gets

          6  physical reads

      15544  redo size

        349  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        359  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          0  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          1  rows processed

 

SQL>

 

 

 

2.4  实验结论

 

COUNT()函数是Oracle中的聚合函数,用于统计结果集的行数。其语法形式如下所示:

 


COUNT({ * | [ DISTINCT | ALL ] expr }) [ OVER (analytic_clause) ]

 

COUNT returns the number of rows returned by the query. You can use it as an aggregate or analytic function.

If you specify DISTINCT, then you can specify only the query_partition_clause of the analytic_clause. The order_by_clause and windowing_clause are not allowed.

If you specify expr, then COUNT returns the number of rows where expr is not null. You can count either all rows, or only distinct values of expr.

If you specify the asterisk (*), then this function returns all rows, including duplicates and nulls. COUNT never returns null.

 

我们把COUNT的使用情况分为以下3类:

① COUNT(1)、COUNT(*)、COUNT(常量)、COUNT(主键)、COUNT(ROWID)、COUNT(非空列)

② COUNT(允许为空列)

③ COUNT(DISTINCT 列名)

下面分别从查询结果和效率方面做个比较:

(一)结果区别

① COUNT(1)、COUNT(*)、COUNT(ROWID)、COUNT(常量)、COUNT(主键)、COUNT(非空列)这几种方式统计的行数是表中所有存在的行的总数,包括值为NULL的行和非空行。所以,这几种方式的执行结果相同。这里的常量可以为数字或字符串,例如,COUNT(2)、COUNT(333)、COUNT('x')、COUNT('xiaomaimiao')。需要注意的是:这里的COUNT(1)中的“1”并不表示表中的第一列,它其实是一个表达式,可以换成任意数字或字符或表达式。

② COUNT(允许为空列) 这种方式统计的行数不会包括字段值为NULL的行。

③ COUNT(DISTINCT 列名) 得到的结果是除去值为NULL和重复数据后的结果。

④ “SELECT COUNT(''),COUNT(NULL) FROM T_COUNT_LHR;”返回0行。

(二)效率、索引

① 如果存在主键或非空列上的索引,那么COUNT(1)、COUNT(*)、COUNT(ROWID)、COUNT(常量)、COUNT(主键)、COUNT(非空列)会首先选择主键上的索引快速全扫描(INDEX FAST FULL SCAN)。若主键不存在则会选择非空列上的索引。若非空列上没有索引则肯定走全表扫描(TABLE ACCESS FULL)。其中,COUNT(ROWID)在走索引的时候比其它几种方式要慢。通过10053事件可以看到这几种方式除了COUNT(ROWID)之外,其它最终都会转换成COUNT(*)的方式来执行。

② 对于COUNT(COL1)来说,只要列字段上有索引则会选择索引快速全扫描(INDEX FAST FULL SCAN)。而对于“SELECT COL1”来说,除非列上有NOT NULL约束,否则执行计划会选择全表扫描。

③ COUNT(DISTINCT 列名) 若列上有索引,且有非空约束或在WHERE子句中使用IS NOT NULL,则会选择索引快速全扫描。其余情况选择全表扫描。

2.5  关于COUNT的优化

统计记录条数,如何才能最快?xb_audit_ddl_lhr表有2303262记录。

(一)全表扫描:


LHR@orclasm > set line 9999

LHR@orclasm > set autot on

LHR@orclasm > set timing on

LHR@orclasm > set time on

12:34:01 LHR@orclasm >

12:35:20 LHR@orclasm > SELECT /*+full(t)*/ COUNT(*) FROM xb_audit_ddl_lhr t;

 

  COUNT(*)

----------

   2303262

 

Elapsed: 00:01:16.53

 

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 3725780224

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation            | Name             | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |                  |     1 | 26629   (1)| 00:05:20 |       |       |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE      |                  |     1 |            |          |       |       |

|   2 |   PARTITION RANGE ALL|                  |  2247K| 26629   (1)| 00:05:20 |     1 |1048575|

|   3 |    PARTITION HASH ALL|                  |  2247K| 26629   (1)| 00:05:20 |     1 |     5 |

|   4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| XB_AUDIT_DDL_LHR |  2247K| 26629   (1)| 00:05:20 |     1 |1048575|

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

          1  recursive calls

         57  db block gets

      92274  consistent gets

      92012  physical reads

          0  redo size

        529  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        519  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          0  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          1  rows processed

 

12:36:47 LHR@orclasm >

 

 

 

 

(二)主键索引


12:38:31 LHR@orclasm > SELECT /*+index(SYS_C0011358)*/ COUNT(*) FROM xb_audit_ddl_lhr t;

 

  COUNT(*)

----------

   2303262

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.24

 

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 2548021478

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation             | Name         | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |              |     1 |  3114   (1)| 00:00:38 |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE       |              |     1 |            |          |

|   2 |   INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| SYS_C0011358 |  2247K|  3114   (1)| 00:00:38 |

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

          0  recursive calls

          2  db block gets

      12283  consistent gets

      12220  physical reads

          0  redo size

        529  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        519  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          0  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          1  rows processed

 

 

 

(三)位图索引


CREATE BITMAP INDEX IND_xb_operation  ON xb_audit_ddl_lhr(operation) local;

12:41:44 LHR@orclasm > SELECT /*+index(IND_xb_operation)*/ COUNT(*) FROM xb_audit_ddl_lhr t;

 

  COUNT(*)

----------

   2303262

 

Elapsed: 00:00:00.00

 

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 1101410508

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation                       | Name             | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                  |     1 |   114   (0)| 00:00:02 |       |       |

|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE                 |                  |     1 |            |          |       |       |

|   2 |   PARTITION RANGE ALL           |                  |  2247K|   114   (0)| 00:00:02 |     1 |1048575|

|   3 |    PARTITION HASH ALL           |                  |  2247K|   114   (0)| 00:00:02 |     1 |     5 |

|   4 |     BITMAP CONVERSION COUNT     |                  |  2247K|   114   (0)| 00:00:02 |       |       |

|   5 |      BITMAP INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IND_XB_OPERATION |       |            |          |     1 |1048575|

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

          0  recursive calls

          0  db block gets

        312  consistent gets

          0  physical reads

          0  redo size

        529  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

        519  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

          2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

          0  sorts (memory)

          0  sorts (disk)

          1  rows processed

 

 

在数据量超大的表上,还可以采用位图索引并行的方式。优化无止境,根据场景选择最适合的才是最好的。

 

第三章 参考文章

 

3.1  MOS

3.1.1  How the Oracle CBO Chooses a Path for the SELECT COUNT(*) Command (文档 ID 124717.1)

 

Purpose:
========

The purpose of this article is to explain how the Oracle Cost Based
Optimizer (CBO) evaluates the best path to do a SELECT COUNT(*) or a
SELECT COLUMN(column) without using a WHERE clause.

Scope & Application:
====================

This article is meant for all DBAs and anyone involved in SQL Tuning.

How the Oracle CBO Chooses a Path for the SELECT COUNT(*) Command:
==================================================================

CBO is invoked when:

  o OPTIMIZER_MODE = CHOOSE, or OPTIMIZER_GOAL = CHOOSE

--AND-- 

  o At least one of the objects of the select statement has
    been analyzed.

Here some examples of select count() without any where clause:

Sel1 : Select count(*) from journal_entries;
Sel2 : Select count(1) from journal_entries;
Sel3 : Select count(id_je) from journal_entries;
Sel4 : Select count(balanced) from journal_entries;

* Table journal_entries has been analyzed.
* id_je is a column with a NOT NULL constraint.
* DATE_JE is a column with a NOT NULL constraint.
* balanced is a column without a NOT NULL constraint.
* There are four indexes on table journal_entries:
  . NDX_ECR_ID_JE on column id_je
  . NDX_ECR_DATE_JE_BALANCED on columns date_je, balanced
  . NDX_ECR_BALANCED_DATE_JE on columns balanced, date_je
  . NDX_ECR_BALANCED on column balanced

I. Sel1 and Sel2:
-----------------

For CBO, Sel1 and Sel2 are strictly equivalent:

1. CBO looks at the table, retrieves statistics, and calculates the
   cost for a full table scan.

2. CBO then looks for all indexes on the table.  In this example it
   lists four indexes.

3. If CBO finds one or more indices which index a column NOT NULL
   or index at least one column NOT NULL, it evaluates the cost of
   the path for each of these indices.

   In our example CBO evaluates three indices:

   - NDX_ECR_ID_JE
   - NDX_ECR_DATE_JE_BALANCED
   - NDX_ECR_BALANCED_DATE_JE

4. CBO chooses the path with the lower cost.  If an index has the lowest
   cost, it is chosen, whatever columns are indexed. 

II. Sel3:
---------

For Sel3, CBO does the same as for Sel1 and Sel2 since "id_je" has a
NOT NULL constraint.

If the column in the count() is NOT NULL, CBO considers the select
strictly equivalent to a select count(*) or a select count(constant).

III. Sel4:
----------

For Sel4, the column in the count() function can have a NULL value.
So, what happens?

- CBO will not evaluate index NDX_ECR_BALANCED since "balanced" has no
  NOT NULL constraint.  If you are sure that NDX_ECR_BALANCED is more
  optimal than performing a full table scan on journal_entries, you must
  rewrite your query from select count(balanced) from journal_entries to:

    select count(*) from journal_entries
    where balanced > " " or 0 (depending on column type)

  CBO will then use the index.
  Even if you write your select with a hint:
          /*+ INDEX (JOURNAL_ENTRIES NDX_ECR_BALANCED) */
  CBO will not use it as it is not evaluated.

- CBO will not evaluate index NDX_ECR_ID_JE because BALANCED is not present
  in this index.

- CBO evaluates indexes NDX_ECR_DATE_JE_BALANCED and NDX_ECR_BALANCED_DATE_JE
  since these indexes contain a column (DATE_JE) which has a NOT NULL
  constraint.  If the cost of one of these two indexes is less than the
  cost of a full table scan, CBO uses this index.  CBO does not take care
  of the position of column balanced in the index.

References:
=========== Note:67522.1 Why is my index not used? 

 

3.2  博客

3.2.1  asmtom

https://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:1156159920245

 

 

You Asked


 

What is the difference between count(1) and count(*) in a sql query

eg.

select count(1) from emp;

and

select count(*) from emp;

 

and we said...

nothing, they are the same, incur the same amount of work -- do the same thing, take the same amount of resources.

You can see this via:


 

ops$tkyte@ORA817.US.ORACLE.COM> alter session set sql_trace=true;

 

Session altered.

 

ops$tkyte@ORA817.US.ORACLE.COM> select count(*) from all_objects;

 

COUNT(*)

----------

27044

 

ops$tkyte@ORA817.US.ORACLE.COM> select count(1) from all_objects

2 /

 

COUNT(1)

----------

27044

 

 

and the tkprof will show:

 

 

 

select count(*)

from

all_objects

 

 

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows

------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Parse 1 0.02 0.02 0 0 0 0

Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0

Fetch 2 5.56 5.56 0 234998 4 1

------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

total 4 5.58 5.58 0 234998 4 1

 

select count(1)

from

all_objects

 

 

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows

------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Parse 1 0.02 0.02 0 0 0 0

Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0

Fetch 2 5.46 5.47 0 234998 4 1

------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

total 4 5.48 5.49 0 234998 4 1

 

 

Same number of blocks read/written/processed, same cpu times (basically) same elapsed times (basically).

 

they are identical.

 

Anyone who thinks different (and I know you are out there) will have to post a test case like the above or some scientific proof otherwise to be taken seriously....

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------



About Me


...............................................................................................................................

● 本文作者:小麦苗,只专注于数据库的技术,更注重技术的运用

● 本文在itpub(http://blog.itpub.net/26736162)、博客园(http://www.cnblogs.com/lhrbest)和个人微信公众号(xiaomaimiaolhr)上有同步更新

● 本文itpub地址:http://blog.itpub.net/26736162/viewspace-2136339/

● 本文博客园地址:http://www.cnblogs.com/lhrbest/p/6645603.html

● 本文pdf版及小麦苗云盘地址:http://blog.itpub.net/26736162/viewspace-1624453/

● QQ群:230161599     微信群:私聊

● 联系我请加QQ好友(646634621),注明添加缘由

● 于 2017-03-28 09:00 ~ 2017-03-30 22:00 在魔都完成

● 文章内容来源于小麦苗的学习笔记,部分整理自网络,若有侵权或不当之处还请谅解

● 版权所有,欢迎分享本文,转载请保留出处

...............................................................................................................................

拿起手机使用微信客户端扫描下边的左边图片来关注小麦苗的微信公众号:xiaomaimiaolhr,扫描右边的二维码加入小麦苗的QQ群,学习最实用的数据库技术。

时间: 2024-07-30 14:34:21

【优化】COUNT(1)、COUNT(*)、COUNT(常量)、COUNT(主键)、COUNT(ROWID)等的相关文章

select count(*)、count(1)、count(主键列)和count(包含空值的列)有何区别?

下班路上看见网上有人问一个问题: oracle 10g以后count(*)和count(非空列)性能方面有什么区别? 乍一看,确实有些含糊,Oracle中往往小问题蕴含着大智慧,如何破云见日? 最直接的方法,我想就是通过10053事件,来看下不同SQL对应的执行计划和资源消耗等情况,进而看看是否有些信息可以为我们所用. 首先,准备测试数据,11g库表bisal的id1列是主键(确保id1列为非空),id2列包含空值, 我们分别用10053打印如下4组SQL的trace, SQL1:select

列出SQL SERVER 所有表,字段名,主键,类型,长度,小数位数等信息

server SELECT        (case when a.colorder=1 then d.name else '' end)表名,        a.colorder 字段序号,        a.name 字段名,        (case when COLUMNPROPERTY( a.id,a.name,'IsIdentity')=1 then '√'else '' end) 标识,        (case when (SELECT count(*)        FROM

主键生成器

这些天忙着做毕业设计,忙着敲代码,早发现像原来那样"无聊"的把那些技术文字再敲一遍是没有多大意义的,因为写出它们所用的时间要是仔细在看或者再用代码做几个实际的例子应该更好吧,其实这是早知道的,那以前知道还那么干,主要是因为太想做老师了吧!现在呢,不那么干不写了是因为暂时放弃做老师的打算吧,这两天空闲的时候复习数据库,翻到了以前的所写的一个存储过程"主键生成器",SQLServer版本的是在以前项目中用过的,Oracle版本的是后面学习Oracle时补上的,不管怎么样

找SQL表的主键

1:利用SQL自带的存储过程 EXEC sp_pkeys @table_name='表名' 2:利用系统表INFORMATION_SCHEMA.KEY_COLUMN_USAGE SELECT TABLE_NAME,COLUMN_NAME FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.KEY_COLUMN_USAGE WHERE TABLE_NAME='表名' 3: 以下这个查询表结构的语句可能大家都见过: 利用syscolumns,sysindexes,sysindexkeys三个表关联可以查

小议主子表INT自增主键插入记录的方法

插入    主子表最常见的大概就是用在进销存.MRP.ERP里面,比如一张销售订单,订单Order(ID,OrderDate),订单明细OrderDetail(OrderID, ProductID, Num,Price)这个大概就是最简单的主子表了,两个表通过ID与OrderID建立关联,这里主键ID是自增的INT类型,OrderID是表OrderDetail的外键.当然,键的选择方法很多,现在我们选择的是在sql里面最简单的方法.    对于这样的表结构,我们最常见的问题就是保存的时候怎样处理

mysql主键的缺少导致备库hang

最近线上频繁的出现slave延时的情况,经排查发现为用户在删除数据的时候,由于表主键的主键的缺少,同时删除条件没有索引,或或者删除的条件过滤性极差,导致slave出现hang住,严重的影响了生产环境的稳定性,也希望通过这篇博客,来加深主键在innodb引擎中的重要性,希望用户在使用RDS,设计自己的表的时候,一定要为表加上主键,主键可以认为是innodb存储引擎的生命,下面我们就来分析一下这个案例(本案例的生产环境的binlog为row模式,对于myisam存储引擎也有同样的问题): (1).现

datagridview-C#如何将DataGridView1中选中的行删除(SQLserver表中的主键为“学号”)

问题描述 C#如何将DataGridView1中选中的行删除(SQLserver表中的主键为"学号") //删除按钮代码private void dele_Click(object sender EventArgs e) { string cnnstr = ""Data Source=.;Database=stutable;User id=sa;PWD=m123""; SqlConnection cnn = new SqlConnection(c

select-关于dev gridview 主键的问题

问题描述 关于dev gridview 主键的问题 前台代码 Width="90%" SkinID="skDev" CssFilePath="~/App_Themes/DevEx/{0}/styles.css" CssPostfix="DevEx"> <%#Container.ItemIndex+1 %> /dx:GridViewDataTextColumn /dx:GridViewDataTextColum

查询一张表中两个字段重复的数据并得到其主键?

问题描述 希望各位路过的大侠 帮小弟一把.感激不尽. 如何查询一张表中两个字段都重复的数据以及每组中的第一条数据的主键? 情况如下: A表: a1 a2 a3  a4   都列a1     a2            a3                  a41       m              n                   o2       m              n                   k3       j                k